Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Strikes Down Zoning and Setback Waiver Provisions of Act 13

This post was written by Emily Thomas and Kevin Abbott

Last week, a divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania judicial panel struck down the provisions of the recent Pennsylvania Oil and Gas legislation, known as "Act 13," that created statewide uniform zoning for purposes of oil and natural gas development in Pennsylvania as unconstitutional by a vote of 4–3. The entire judicial panel also held that the portions of Act 13, which authorized the DEP to grant a waiver of certain setback requirements from water bodies and wetlands, were null and void. This Reed Smith client alert summarizes and analyzes the July 26 court opinion, and provides guidance related to the future procedural path of the case.

"Best Practices" Guidance Released for Marcellus Shale Operators

This post was written by Jennifer Smokelin

In order to reduce liability for natural gas development, it is a given that companies "know the rules and make sure you comply with them." A corollary to this maxim is that companies understand the industry's "best practices" and strive to follow them. For hydraulic fracturing, the American Petroleum Institute had issued industry guidance/best practices on hydraulic fracturing and, a few days ago, the Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) released its first recommended practices (RP) that offers guidance on site planning, development and restoration. The RP will assist industry professionals operating in the Appalachian basin in improving their effectiveness in the site planning, development and restoration aspects of responsible natural gas exploration and production. The RP was developed by the MSC’s Land Affairs Committee and it set forth 11 steps in the site preparation, development and restoration process for natural gas development, beginning with identifying the need for a new well site, compressor station or pipeline, and ending with site monitoring, maintenance and repair. The guidance document is the first of many that MSC is expected to release in the coming months, and the additional guidance is expected to cover topics from well construction to air quality and water management.
 

Slides and Audio from Reed Smith's Teleseminar on Shale Gas

This post was written by David Wagner

With all of the recent attention given to shale gas, we featured the issue in our quarterly Environmental and Energy Teleseminar. Here are the slides and audio from yesterday’s event. In particular, we discussed:

  • Recent developments related to aggregation and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s new air emission rules for the oil and gas industry
  • Hydraulic fracturing and chemical disclosure requirements, especially in state jurisdictions
  • Overview of fracking regulations and developments on federal level
  • Pending shale gas legislation in California
  • Overview of international shale plays

Look for our next quarterly teleseminar this summer.
 

USEPA's New Air Emission Rules for Oil and Gas Industry Address Some Industry Concerns but Raise Others

This post was written by Jennifer Smokelin

On April 17, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the first-ever final regulation setting limits on air pollution from natural gas production aimed at reducing toxic air pollution from the natural-gas drilling process called fracking. EPA updated its New Source Performance Standards (NSPSs) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) to include emissions from oil and gas production. The new standards will reduce the amount of methane, volatile organic compounds, and other emissions coming from fracking operations by requiring that all newly fractured or refractured wells incorporate reduced emissions controls (RECs). The regulations will also target emissions from compressors, oil storage tanks and other oil-and-gas sector equipment.

The biggest news is that, under the final rules, EPA delayed the deadline for requiring the use of RECs or “green completions”. In its proposed rule, “green completions” were required 60 days after final publication of the rule in the Federal Register. Now, under the final rule, well operator and owners have until January 1, 2015 before they need to conduct green completions. Between now and 2015, compliance with the rules can be achieved via reductions using flaring or other approved combustion methods, although early adoption of green completion is "encouraged".

In addition, there are a few other exemptions from compliance under the final rules. For example, wells drilled in low-pressure areas, such as coal-bed methane reserves, are exempt because these wells release less pollution during completion. And companies that choose to re-fracture wells using the pollution-reducing equipment prior to the January 2015 deadline would not be covered by the NSPS. These are significant changes from the rule as proposed in July 2011.

Despite these changes, industry still remains concerned about federal regulation of the oil and gas industry, including issues of “regulation overlap” (that is, where one federal agency will require one thing while another federal agency will regulate the industry another way). As we reported on the blog last week, President Obama announced the formation of a high-level task force last week charged with coordinating oversight of fracking in an effort to reassure industry groups that are concerned about overlapping federal regulations. Of course, it remains to be seen whether this will be successful.
 

 

Local Zoning Laws Remain in Place for the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Industry - For Now

This post was written by Nicolle Bagnell and Luke Liben

When Pennsylvania’s new Marcellus Shale drilling law (known as Act 13) goes into effect on April 14, the section that preempts local drilling ordinances will be temporarily put on hold. Although Act 13 specifically overrides local zoning laws related to oil and gas operations, yesterday the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court granted an injunction of the enactment of all provisions addressing the state’s preemption of oil and gas zoning laws. In the matter Robinson Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, No. 284 M.D. 2012, the court issued a 120-day injunction that will extend the time period that municipalities have to craft new ordinances to comply with Act 13. The plaintiffs in the case, mostly municipal officials and two individuals, stated that the injunction was necessary to avoid any uncertainty that would otherwise arise in this 120-day period. No other aspects of Act 13 will be affected by the injunction.

 

Spotlight on Shale Gas: Join Us for Reed Smith's Environmental and Energy Law Resource Teleseminar on April 25

On April 25, 2012, Reed Smith will focus on environmental issues related to shale gas during its quarterly teleseminar. This free teleseminar will be held from Noon to 1 pm ET.

Topics include:

  • Air pollution aggregation update and status of NSPS fracturing regulation
  • Fracking disclosure: Pennsylvania's new Act 13 and other jurisdictions
  • Overview of federal fracking regulations
  • Pending shale gas legislation in California
  • Overview of international shale plays

The speakers at this event will be: Larry Demase (Pittsburgh), Lynne Freeman (London), Todd Maiden (San Francisco), Jennifer Smokelin (Pittsburgh), and David Wagner (Pittsburgh). To read more about our speakers, please click the attorney's name.

TO REGISTER: Please click here.

Legislation Watch: Pennsylvania's Impact Fee - November 17 Update

This post was written by Jennifer Smokelin and Nicolle Bagnell.

The Pennsylvania Senate approved an impact fee as well as other regulatory measures with regard to drilling in the Marcellus shale by a vote of 29-20. The Senate bill is the first comprehensive legislation on natural gas drilling to be approved in the Senate since the Marcellus Shale boom began. The measure would assess a decreasing fee of $50,000 per well annually, strengthen environmental regulations, and allow for the attorney general's office to review local zoning rules related to natural gas extraction. Measures proposed earlier this week were unsuccessful including measures to rearrange how that fee is assessed and its revenues distributed, increase bonding requirements, and prevent state involvement in local drilling rules. The Senate bill was widely and lengthily debated.

The focus now shifts to the other chamber as the Senate bill heads to the state House of Representatives. The House is also separately engaged in a debate over its own a drilling oversight measures this week and is expected to vote on their measure by week's end. House lawmakers approved an amendment on a vote of 110-85 that incorporates the zoning standardization approach contained in the Senate bill. Read more about the legislation here.

Legislation Watch: Pennsylvania's Impact Fee - November 16, 2011

This post was written by Jennifer Smokelin and Nicolle Bagnell.

Are the Pennsylvania House and Senate setting up to pass legislation to assess an impact fee on natural gas drillers and strengthen oversight of the industry by week's end?

On Monday, legislation to assess an impact fee on natural gas drillers was approved by a key Pennsylvania state Senate panel. It is headed for a final vote in the Senate chamber today. The new state-assessed impact fee would levy an initial base cost of $50,000 per well, which would decrease annually until year 11 of production. Year 11 through year 20 of production would then cost $10,000 per well. The levy would increase if natural gas prices went up. The fee proposal would raise $94 million from wells that were producing this year and would rise to $155 million next year.

Across the Rotunda in Harrisburg, the state House of Representatives began debate on potential amendments to the House's proposed drilling impact fee and regulatory measure. Discussion on the House-drafted measure is expected to continue this week in an effort to pass legislation by the end of the week.

The debate on these Senate and House measures focuses on the amount of the impact fee and how much deference is given to local zoning laws regarding drilling. Democrats tend to voice opposition to allowing state government to determine whether local drilling rules via zoning are reasonable. Republicans and Governer Corbett's administration, however, favor an approach that would entirely preempt local regulation of drilling operations, arguing that standardized rules on a state level would encourage natural gas companies to continue creating jobs in Pennsylvania. Additional details are here.

Stay tuned this week for follow-up on this breaking legislation….

Your Invitation to an April 12 Teleseminar on Marcellus Shale and Greenhouse Gas Reporting

This post was written by David Wagner.

Please join us for the second of three teleseminars on air quality issues affecting oil and gas development in Marcellus Shale On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 from 12 p.m. - 1 p.m., Reed Smith and AECOM will discuss the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s issues related to greenhouse gases in the Marcellus Shale. In particular, we will cover (1) sources of greenhouse gases, (2) reporting, and (3) Title V implications. This event will feature Jennifer Smokelin and David Wagner of Reed Smith and Tom Bianca of AECOM. To participate, please contact Sandy Petrakis by April 11.

The First of Three Teleseminars on Air Quality Issues Affecting Oil & Gas Development in Marcellus Shale

This post was written by David Wagner.

Reed Smith has teamed up with AECOM to present three teleseminars on air quality issues affecting oil and gas development in the Marcellus Shale. At the first teleseminar on February 11, 2011, we discussed the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) air permitting process, focusing on the general permits applicable to oil and gas activities (GP-5, GP-9, GP-11), requests for determinations (RFDs) and the permit exemption list, as well as DEP’s proposals to narrow the oil and gas permit exemption list and modify GP-5. Click here for the teleseminar’s audio recording and here for the handout. The event featured Larry Demase and Jennifer Smokelin of Reed Smith and Tom Bianca of AECOM.

Check back for details on the remaining two teleseminars that will address greenhouse gases and aggregation.