USEPA to Consider Vapor Intrusion Component in Superfund Site Listing

This post was written by Steven Nolan.

On January 28, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced that it will consider vapor intrusion, the migration of volatile chemicals from contaminated groundwater or soil into buildings, as part of its system for listing Superfund hazardous waste sites. Beginning next month, USEPA will start the process with three public listening sessions. USEPA will host its first public listening session at its Arlington, Va. office on February 11, 2011. Two additional listening sessions will be held in San Francisco, Calif. and Albuquerque, N.M.

At the meetings, USEPA will accept public input on whether to include a vapor intrusion component to the Hazard Ranking System, which is the principal mechanism USEPA uses to place hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) of Superfund sites. The listing of a site on the NPL brings the site within the reach of the federal Superfund law, formally known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. Superfund sites are eligible for federal cleanup funds, and are subject to the detailed federal cleanup regulations set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations.

USEPA's decision to evaluate whether to include a vapor intrusion component in the Hazard Ranking System stems from recommendations issued last year by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). GAO concluded that if vapor intrusion sites are not assessed and, if needed, listed on the NPL, there is the potential that contaminated sites with unacceptable human exposure will not be acted upon. GAO recommended that USEPA determine the extent to which USEPA will consider vapor intrusion in listing NPL sites and how this will affect the number of NPL sites listed in the future.

Interested in Participating in Carbon Capture and Storage Coalition? Please Let Us Know

We are involved in forming the Carbon Capture and Storage Coalition, a unique, non-profit coalition of industries involved in carbon capture and storage (CCS) that will analyze and develop key resources—model legislation and regulation, capacity-building programs, performance standards and commercial models—to accelerate CCS deployment. To develop these resources, the CCS Coalition will partner with academic institutions who are working at the forefront of CCS technology.

Carbon Capture and Storage

The CCS Coalition Is Unique

While there is a fair amount of CCS research and large-scale testing taking place, there is insufficient development of implementing legislation, regulations, capacity-building programs, standards, and commercial models. And while there are several CCS associations in the United States, all of them are relatively small and serve a traditional trade association role, i.e., support business interests, inform members about developments, and generally advocate for CCS. These groups are not developing detailed legal frameworks or capacity-building programs or performance standards.

The CCS Coalition will fill this space and, led by CCS experts in the engineering and legal fields, provide a unique and specialized approach to CCS development. Initially, the primary audience for the Coalition’s input will be U.S. federal and state lawmakers, policymakers, regulators, stakeholders, and business leaders, and its primary objective is to ensure that evolving greenhouse gas regulatory regimes incorporate CCS in a manner that is safe, environmentally sound, affordable, and compatible with emerging international regulations and standards.

Proposed Activities

In addition to issues identified by its industry members, the CCS Coalition will fill regulatory and programmatic gaps identified in August 2010 by the U.S. Federal Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage and recently by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel. The CCS Coalition’s proposed activities include:

  • Analyze and determine the most appropriate regulatory structures for addressing potential long-term liabilities.
  • Develop regulatory frameworks for CCS for onshore and offshore federal lands.
  • Develop capacity-building programs for underground injection control regulators.
  • Analyze how the National Environmental and Policy Act would apply to CCS to help ensure timely completion of robust and comprehensive environmental reviews.
  • Create performance standards consistent with the expectation of storage permanence and safety.
  • Develop regulations in California under the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) regarding the treatment of CO2 emission reductions from CCS projects in capped and uncapped emission sources.
  • Create a business model for commercial-scale CCS project that addresses and resolves key issues related to financial, insurance, liability and regulatory structures.
  • Maintain a database on U.S. state CCS policies and legal developments.
  • Seek to brief and educate U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) attorneys and other government officials on our relevant regulatory analysis and recommendations, especially given our extensive contacts at EPA’s Office of General Counsel.

Some Reasons to Participate

The CCS Coalition is seeking members from industries including oil and gas companies, power generators, pipeline companies, manufacturers, carbon storage servicers, banks, financial institutions, insurers, consultants, and other related industries. Some of the business reasons for participating in the CCS Coalition include the opportunity to:

  • Identify and prioritize legislative, regulatory and commercial gaps related to CCS.
  • Advance legislative, regulatory and programmatic models and support their implementation by working with lawmakers, policymakers, regulators, and business leaders.
  • Improve knowledge and understanding of CCS legal developments.
  • Network with other member companies.

For more information, please contact David Wagner.

California Review Panel Determines that Carbon Capture and Storage Could Help Reduce State GHG Emissions

This post was written by Todd Maiden and  David Wagner.

As we mentioned in a recent blog post, carbon capture and storage momentum continues to build. Last week, California’s Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel released its findings and recommendations for resolving legal, regulatory and financial issues that currently impede the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the state. Among the key findings are:

  • There is a public benefit from long-term geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a strategy for reducing GHG emissions to the atmosphere.
  • Technology exists that can safely and effectively capture, transport and storage CO2 from power plants and other large industrial facilities.
  • There is a need for clear rules under AB32 regarding the treatment of CO2 emissions reductions from CCS projects.
  • There is a need for clear, efficient, and consistent regulatory requirements and authority for permitting all phases of CCS projects in California, including CO2 capture, transport, and storage.

Among others, the CCS Review Panel recommends that the state:

  • Recognize CO2 emission reductions achieved through CCS satisfy California’s requirements for GHG emission reductions under AB32.
  • Designate specific state regulatory agencies as the lead agencies for different aspects and activities related to CCS.
  • Consider legislation establishing an industry-funded trust fund to manage and be responsible for geologic site operations in the post-closure phase.
  • Declare that the surface owner is the owner of the subsurface “pore space” needed to store CO2.

 

U.S. Government Announces Funding of $184 M for Next Generation of Cars and Trucks

This post was written by Christopher Rissetto, Henry King and Robert Helland.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the availability of $184 million "to accelerate the development and deployment of new efficient vehicle technologies." DOE will award cooperative agreements to businesses, universities and nonprofits to promote research and development of technologies supporting energy-efficient and environmentally friendly highway vehicles (i.e., cars and trucks). This funding is provided through the Vehicle Technologies Program, whose mission is to reduce consumption of gasoline and diesel fuels by cars and trucks, which account for 55 percent of total U.S. oil use. In this Reed Smith client alert, we discuss specifics of the eight funding categories that range from the development of performance-enhancing fuels and lubricants to the development of fuel-efficient tires and the creation of greater driver feedback technologies. The client alert also details other project and award information. You should know that the authors of this post have worked with a number of clients in crafting competitive applications for grant funding and complementary strategies to achieve funding, including obtaining support and assistance from members of Congress. Please let us know if we can assist with the preliminary notice and development of a competitive application for these funds.

 

11 Climate Change Issues in 2011

This post was written by Jennifer Smokelin and  David Wagner .

As we look forward to 2011, the Environmental Team at Reed Smith will be on top of a range of environmental issues, but offers the following analysis of what we view, in no particular order, to be 11 key climate change or greenhouse gas-related issues likely to affect you and your business in 2011 – call it “11 Climate Change Issues for ’11.” This post focuses on regulatory and transactional issues and we will analyze the outcomes of GHG-related court challenges as they unfold. Please return to blog regularly for updates and analysis on these and many other issues.

The 11 climate change issues are listed below.

Continue Reading...